AGP

EL VALOR DE LA DISIDENCIA

La derrota esta semana del Proyecto del IVA ha revelado un lado oscuro de la política boricua; el castigo certero y veloz de la disciplina de partido. Seis representantes PPD votaron en contra del proyecto de administración y se les relevó de la presidencia de comisiones y hasta se les redujo su presupuesto, tal vez forzando despidos en sus oficinas. Gente de su propio partido que hicieron campaña por él. De forma más atenuada, el PNP castigó al representante Pellé, así que este no es un mal exclusivo de los rojos. Si, un mal.

Estos 7 legisladores desafiaron a sus lideres y votaron de forma diferente y nos guste o no, para eso precisamente se les eligió. Uno puede pensar que Pellé votó como le dijo Vega Borges o que los seis del PPD lo hicieron para perjudicar al Gobernador o cualquier otra teoría de conspiración. La realidad es que son disidentes. Recuerdo haber escuchado la palabra ser usada sobre Alexander Solzhenitsin y Andrei Sakharov en la antigua Unión Soviética. Todos sabemos los sufrimientos que el ser fieles a su conciencia les causó.

Un gobierno que celebra a un Oscar López, encontrado culpable de sedición, como un prisionero de conciencia no tiene fuerza moral para castigar a sus propios representantes que fielmente votaron por sus anteriores proyectos.

El tolerar y aceptar la disidencia, es la esencia de la democracia y estas soberbias y vengativas acciones son detrimentales.

Advertisements

THE GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT BANK LETTER

Yesterday, the Government Development Bank made public a letter to Governor Alejandro García Padilla, Sen. Eduardo Bhatia and House Speaker Jaime Perelló. To some, the letter is simply a way to put pressure on the Legislature for the swift approval of a VAT and a new version of the “wolf is coming” tale. The letter, however, highlights a lot more than the Government’s economic situation.

In its second paragraph, the letter asserts that the financial situation of the Commonwealth is “extremely precarious.” It continues saying that a “government closing in the next three months is very probable due to lack of liquidity to operate.” The way it reads in Spanish, it is NOT saying that in three months there will be a government closing but rather during this three-month period. Although this may simply be a tactic to pressure the Legislature, nevertheless it is a serious admission. Governor García Padilla tooted his horn when the present budget was approved that this was the first balanced budget in many, many years, although many analysts, including yours truly, mentioned that it was not since part of the debt service was from capitalized funds of the March 2014 bond issue. Reality, however, is even grimmer. The Government overestimated the funds it would recover due to over 85 new taxes and has a deficit of between $200 and $500 million for this fiscal year. Since the Government Development Bank lacks funds, a loan from this agency is out.

Another important admission by the Government Development Bank is that the $2.95 billion bond issue is highly improbable as confirmed by banks and potential buyers, allegedly due to the “growing uncertainty about the Government’s fiscal initiatives, especially the tax reform and the 2016 budget.” At this time, the 2016 proposed budget has not been presented to the Legislature since there is no final decision on the VAT.

The letter insists that there is an immediate need to establish expense reduction measures. This, although Law 66 was supposed to reduce expenses in 10%. The letter adds three indispensable measures; “(1) development and approval of by the Executive and the Legislature of a 5 years fiscal adjustment plan that eliminates the historical practice of financing recurring expenses with long term debt and that achieves the sustainability of the Government through a radical transformation of the governmental structure; (2) the approval of a Tax Reform whose recurring income satisfies the recurring expenses of the central Government; (3) the approval of a budget for the next fiscal year of a budget that adjusts, in an intelligent manner, public spending to the fiscal reality of the country (país).”

These statements have several problems. The letter does not explain what a “fiscal adjustment plan” is. Is it restructuring or simply is a legal framework in which to prohibit borrowing to balance a budget? If it is restructuring, no details are provided and given previous statements by the island’s executive, this will not happen but of course it can always be another lie. As to legal framework, the Puerto Rico Constitution makes clear that all budgets must be balanced but both parties have ignored this requirement and not challenges of the practice has been attempted in Court. Hence, we have no idea what this means.

The second measure is clearly geared to convince legislators to approve a VAT, which all sectors in the island have rejected, except the Government. Moreover, if we look back in history, in 2006, Governor Aníbal Acevedo Vilá closed the government in order to blackmail the legislature into approving a sales tax. The legislature quickly approved it and the island has never recuperated. Now, the Government wants more revenue with no guaranty there will be any control of its spending, which is the real fiscal problem. Moreover, until this issue is resolved, the Governor will not present the budget and when he does, the process will be thoughtless, hasty and counterproductive.

The third measure is another joke. As stated before, the present budget was supposed to be balanced but it was not and worse, collections were overstated. Politicians are very adept at lying through their teeth and they will continue to do it in order to get reelected.

The letter also mentions that the Government Development Bank, with the “help of economists and external consultants (i.e. Milco and Cleary Gottlieb) are coordinating the development of the plan for fiscal adjustment.” It admits that the Executive and the Legislature are needed in order to put the plan into effect. The problem is that there is no timetable for the plan and next year is election year. Good luck with that one.

What is lacking in the letter is any mention of an ECONOMIC development plan. Actually, this administration has never mentioned it has any plan for economic growth. It is important to note that the letter is signed by, among others, Alberto Bacó, Secretary of Economic Development and Commerce of Puerto Rico. For over two years he has been telling us how everything was going so well, how the economy was strong, vibrant and in clear recovery. I refer to him as the administration’s buffoon and his signing of the letter demonstrates that it has all been smoke and mirrors.

Why would any investor buy Puerto Rico’s debt with these admissions is beyond me. It is tantamount to throwing good money after bad.

El Futuro

Desde el comienzo de este cuatrienio, el Gobernador Alejandro García Padilla nos ha mentido. Luego de su elección, nos dijo que iba a haber una sesión extraordinaria el día de su inauguración, a pesar que muchos le indicaron que la Constitución disponía otra cosa, ver Artículo III, sección 10 de la misma. Obviamente, vino el 2 de enero y no hubo sesión extraordinaria. Nos prometió el legislador ciudadano pero lo que se hizo fue quitarle las dietas. Prometió bajar el IVU a 6.5% y ahora lo sustituye con un IVA mucho más alto.

Lo que si ha hecho este gobierno es imponer contribuciones. Desde el principio de su gobierno, García Padilla ha hecho claro que no va a despedir empleados. Para no hacerlo, tenía que buscar recaudos y acabó imponiendo más de 85 impuestos (imagen cortesía de Wilfredo Ramos). Al comenzar su cuatrienio PR era la jurisdicción de USA con el impuesto más bajo a la gasolina. Ahora es la jurisdicción con el impuesto más alto.

Su último invento es un IVA que a pesar de la “oposición” de la minoría sería más del doble de IVU. Como bien dijo el Senador del PPD, Ramón Luis Nieves, nadie que no fuera el gobierno o los economistas pagos por el gobierno concuerdan con el proyecto radicado por el Gobernador. De todas maneras el IVA se va a aprobar de forma modificada pero tendrá el mismo resultado; empujar la isla a un espiral aún más acelerado de retroceso económico y miseria que rivalizará la década del 30. Uno no crece una economía con impuestos y el gobierno no es más importante que sus ciudadanos.

Algunos analistas entienden que PR si puede pagar su deuda si reduce significativamente los gastos. Otros, entienden que hay que reestructurar la deuda. Una u otra idea conlleva grandes cambios a la manera de hacer las cosas en PR y parece que el Gobernador carece de la entereza, interés o sapiencia para hacerlo.

Esto no es más que el resultado de décadas de ideas populistas y socialistas de un PPD inspirado por las economías planeadas de la Alemania Nazi y la Unión Soviética. Parece que el partido no se enteró que estas sociedades fallaron y dejaron de existir. Nos toca a nosotros entenderlo y rechazar estas ideas anacrónicas. Nuestro futuro es una economía liberada de las cadenas de un gobierno benefactor, basada en el conocimiento y la recompensa a los que crean la riqueza y no a los políticos y sus huestes.